Freeessaysample

Triangular Theory & Lee’s Styles Essay

Triangular Theory & Lee’s Styles Essay.

Triangular Theory & Lee’s Styles Essay

order #97790300

Topic:

Write about the strengths and weaknesses of both the “Triangular Theory” and Lee’s “Styles of Loving”

Type of paper:

Essay (any type)

Discipline:

Sociology

Format or citation style:

MLA

Pages: 2

Deadline: 8 hrs

FIRST: Research the “Triangular Theory” and Lee’s” Styles of Loving ” in the study of sociology.

NEXT:Write about the strengths and weaknesses of both the “Triangular Theory” and Lee’s “Styles of Loving”

NOTE: On the first page do a short introduction of the “Triangular Theory”  and then list the strengthens and weaknesses of the “Triangular Theory”. On the second page do a short intro of Lee’s “Styles of Loving” then list the strengths and weaknesses of Lee’s “Styles of Loving”. Include some examples and make sure to cite.

NOTE: Please follow instructions as my professor is very strict

Name

Professor

Course

Date

Triangular Theory and Lee’s Styles of Loving

Part 1

Robert Sternberg formulated a concept known as the triangular theory of love, which is made up of three components that explain love. The components include; commitment, passion and intimacy (Sternberg 119). Intimacy entails how close and connected one feels when in a loving relationship. Passion is the drive that leads to sexual consummation and physical attraction while commitment is the ability to love one person for a long time. He argues that the three components define love together because if one component is use alone, it becomes meaningless. For example commitment alone is empty love, intimacy on its own is a liking while passion is viewed as infatuation (Sternberg 123).

One strength of this theory is that it is very useful during couple’s therapy because it provides an outline of love. For example a psychologist can determine what aspect of love is missing in a certain relationship like the absence of intimacy and so on. The theory proves that that there are many types of love but their all built upon commitment, passion and intimacy. For example companionate love is formed by commitment and intimacy and such a love lacks the physical and sexual aspect that every relationship needs. People around the world can analyses the type of relationship they are in though this theory and it helps them identify a specific the kind of love they want. For example there are people who prefer to be in relationships where there is passion and intimacy only.

One weakness of the triangular theory is that it is only descriptive. It only describes the types of love that revolve around commitment, intimacy and passion. Another weakness it that it is oversimplified such that it cannot be applied in vague and complicated situations (Sternberg 123). For example there people who only want to be in intimate relationships but do not want to commit to their partners and they do not want them to date other people. Since the theory simplifies love to commitment, passion, and intimacy when couple realize that they lack one component they focus their attention on getting that component back and end up neglecting the rest.

Part 2

John Lee, a sociologist defined love in six basic styles which include: Eros, Mania, Ludus, Storge, Agape, and Pragma (Lee 1). Eros is love of beauty at first sight. Such lovers are attracted at the physical attributes that their partners possess. Ludic lovers are playful, they have no intentions of commitment and are in the relationship for fun.  Storge love is shared between companions and is often uneventful or unadventurous. Mania lovers are obsessive and it is a combination of Eros and Ludus. Pragmatic lovers are logical lovers. They calculate their partners’ moves, ambitions and life goals before committing to them (Lee 2). Agape love is the Christian love that does not expect reciprocation. Lee argues that for a couple to have a full filling relationship they need to belong to the same style of loving.

One strength of Lees’ type of love is that it gives couples a chance to identify the type of love they express to their partners and vise versus. For example a girl could be experiencing Eros kind of love but her boyfriend is playing games (Lee 2). Most women who experience Mania lover from their men are often in abuse relationship, Lee’s theory helps such women understand how a Maniac lover express love especially since they can be moody and extremely jealous. The theory helps researches to have a better understanding gender differences in love. For example most men express erotic love, game playing and agape love while women are pragmatic, manic and storgic lovers.

One weakness of the theory is that, it is easy to misjudge one’s love personality since the theory lists behavior characteristics of each type of love.  For example, one may mistake an Erotic lover for a player because of lack of certain behaviors such as possessiveness (Lee 1). Another weakness for the theory is the belief that one should only love a person whom they share the same love type. This kills the sense of adventure in relationships and leads to boredom and eventually breakups. For example, a pragmatic lover may desire to be with an erotic lover or a maniac lover for adventure.

Work cited

Lee, John. Types Of Love. 1973. Web. 2 Nov. 2017.

 Sternberg, Robert. “A Triangular Theory Of Love.” American Physiological Association93.2 (1986): 1-17. Print.

Browse more products here

Order Here

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.