The Scientific Revolution Sample Essay

The Scientific Revolution Sample Essay.

The Scientific Revolution Sample Essay

            Category: Others

Pick one video from CrashCourse’s History of Science videos to watch.

CrashCourse History of Science Channel (Links to an external site.)

Create a post reviewing the video and stating interesting things you have learned. Don’t forget to mention the title of the video that you viewed.

Respond to two of your classmates’ posts. In your responses, try to be thoughtful. Stay away from “Me too!” or a simple “That’s so interesting!” If you found something interesting, say what you thought was interesting. If you’re curious about more, ask questions. Even if your classmate doesn’t know the answer, it’s okay to mention what you thought was interesting and ask “do you know why/how/etc” type questions.

The Scientific Revolution

Students Name

University’s Name


Professor’s Name


The Scientific Revolution

The scientific revolution video describes the series of events in the early 16th and 17th centuries, allowing the emergence of modern science. Observation of the events, facts and logical ideas around the world contributed to the growth of science. During the early days, people depended on stories told by the Greek writers and the catholic church officials to understand the world. Scientific revolution made the people understand that science is made up of facts; hence the educated people concentrated more on what they observed around the world to explain the science and more minor on what they were told. The crash course history of science in explaining the scientific revolution dwells mostly on different stories told by historians over the years. From the video, I have learned interesting things as different philosophers and historians explain how the scientific revolution came to be.

To start with, the philosopher and historian Thomas Kuhn, in his book, the structure of the scientific revolution, argues that science undergoes revolutions depending on the data collected by scientists, which they are unable to explain using the paradigm shifts. Paradigm is a combined research program used as a collection of ideas that instruct scientists on what to believe and how to work. They never challenged it but instead used it to solve the problems whose solutions were reinforced (CrashCourse, 2018). The second historian named Nicole Oresme, argued the theory of the earth revolving around the sun. During his learning period, he spent a lot of time trying to answer where we as humans lived. Oresme wrote the book of heaven and the world, in which he described that the earth must remain still and chill since it made more sense for the planet to move around the sun than all the heavens moving around the earth.

Third, Nicolaus Copernicus wrote the book De rev, where he argued that other stars were just like the sun, only that they appeared to be farther away from the sun and that the earth rotates on its axis. The earth rotating on its axis was the third motion that helped define a year and a transition from day to night defining the day. Copernicus’s theory dictated a definite order of the planets according to size and names, which made the universe wider than the Ptolemy. Finally, Natural philosophers such as Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle pushed for experiments to be sure and later published their results in journals (CrashCourse, 2018). Many stories explain the scientific revolutions, and just as science is an active area of research, historians also have to choose what stories to tell and how to frame them in their own time and place accurately.


CrashCourse 2018.The Scientific Revolution: Crash Course History of Science #12. [VIDEO]

Browse more products here

Order Here

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.