The Pros And Cons of Climate Change Is A Reality

The Pros And Cons: Climate Change Is A Reality.

Name:

Professor:

Subject:

Date:

The Pros And Cons: Climate Change Is A Reality.

Climate change is an aspect that is evident in this day and age, and it takes bold decisions to ensure that future generations have a place to call home.  Inadvertently, there is a need to have in place energy to provide technological advancements necessary in this time (Bai et al., 2018).  Therefore, there is a need to conserve the environment and ensure technological advancements.  It is no longer a myth that carbon emission is destroying the one layer accruing to various adverse climatic conditions.  Therefore, the reality, in context, is to ensure that there is a platform to generate environmentally friendly energy to ensure the safety of the globe and boost the venture in technological advancements. This study, therefore, seeks to elucidate various avenues that present themselves around the world and strategies that can be adopted to ensure that future generations are assured of a comfortable and safe environment to live in. It is an indicator that climatic challenges occur due to human actions and omissions, and it is high time to address it and take action before it is too late.  

Emissions, concentrations, climate change, and consequences are all intertwined in complicated ways. Understanding the many connections between industrial activities, greenhouse effect (GHG) pollution, changes in weather patterns composition, earth climatic response, and repercussions on social-ecological systems is necessary for forecasting consequences of global warming (Bai et al. 2018). Although the essential components in this chain are generally recognized, other elements (particularly estimating specific impacts at specific times and locations) are not. As a result, and instead of being provided as precise forecasts, the effects of measures to cut emissions or lower the vulnerabilities of human and environmental systems must typically be expressed in stochastic or evaluative terms.

Environmental change is happening. Human-induced greenhouse gas emissions most likely cause it, and it poses considerable dangers to a variety of human and natural systems. Moreover, these pollutants continue to rise, resulting in even more growth and increased dangers. Climatic Decisions are the basis that climate change’s ecological, commercial, and social dangers demonstrate the urgent need for immediate action to limit the extent of environmental issues and brace for its consequences. Taking action now will lessen the concerns climate change poses and the effort to make broader, faster, and perhaps more costly cutbacks subsequently (Lam et al. 2020).  The majority of efforts made to decrease climate change susceptibility are rational thinking measures that will defend against natural climate shifts and unexpected disasters. Furthermore, critical technology and infrastructural improvement choices taken now might “seal in” greenhouse emissions pledges for years and years to come(Kellorg 2019). Finally, whereas many reactions to climate change can be scaled back or reversed, it is difficult or even impossible to “undo” global warming after it has occurred.

            Local, state, as well as private-sector actions are necessary. However, they are unlikely to attain the desired level of advancement as what could be attained with the addition of solid federal mandates that create consistent national objectives and incentives and encourage strong government participation in global response efforts (Kellorg 2019). Implementing a recursive risk management plan and taking measures to considerably reduce carbon emissions, prepare for repercussions, invest in scientific research, technological innovation, and information systems, and expedite involvement in both technical and scientific professionals and the many types of interested parties making the climate decisions are the best ways to address the complex nature and unpredictability of climate change.

            There are significant time gaps in how the earth’s climate will respond to pressure from Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and several of the sociological, technological, and political structures that should react to climate change also have considerable time lags. Having to wait until all ambiguities have been answered or the effects of concern are now pronounced will almost likewise imply it will be too late to mitigate numerous risks.

            Climate change and its repercussions cannot be predicted precisely for any given global greenhouse gas level due to uncertainty in climate sensitivity and other parameters. However, even “medium” climate change can pose significant dangers, and there is the prospect of irreparable meltdowns in the terrestrial ecosystem, beyond which inevitable negative consequences may occur (Hsiang et al., 2017).  The sooner genuine attempts to cut GHG emissions begin, the less impetus there will be later on to undertaking steeper (and thus presumably costlier) reduce emissions.

Today’s investment decisions, both corporate and government sectors, will have a long-term impact on the ability to reduce emissions and adapt to climate change. Investments in energy production, for example, can imply a significant commitment to future GHG emissions. Stakeholders must put the appropriate strategies and policies as soon as humanly possible to provide critical advice for these investment decisions (Lu et al., 2019). Finally, the dangers of carrying on with business as usual are far more significant than the dangers of launching ambitious but restrained reaction activities. Many features of an “overly ambitious” reform strategy might be overturned or otherwise handled by later policy decisions. However, detrimental climatic changes are considerably more difficult (actually, unattainable) to “reverse” the time scale of human lives.

Therefore, recent rapid climate change has worsened existing environmental issues brought on by a mix of land uses, pollution, and dwindling biodiversity. New change and future projections for five broad and linked impact areas (water, habitats, food, healthcare, and security) consistently show large and growing dangers in the following decades (Nordhaus 2019). Laws for governments’ long-term development must ameliorate these threats and consider adaptation strategies, but there is currently insufficient data, particularly for most vulnerable societies with fewer structured observation strategies and impact models. A concerted effort is undertaken to synthesize current scientific information from several fields better to understand the combined dangers better.

This paper has highlighted ways in which climate change is a reality and poses a threat to the globe’s well-being and existence. The paper highlights various avenues that need to be prioritized to ensure sustainable development growth and proper conservation of the environment.  Issues like the need to have appropriate policies to guide corporate and governments is a mandate that will guarantee adaptation of mechanisms that will combat carbon emission and its adversities.

References

Bai, X., Dawson, R. J., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Delgado, G. C., Barau, A. S., Dhakal, S., … & Schultz,

S. (2018). Six research priorities for cities and climate change.The Pros And Cons of Climate Change

Hsiang, S., Kopp, R., Jina, A., Rising, J., Delgado, M., Mohan, S., … & Houser, T. (2017).

Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science, 356(6345), 1362-1369.

Bai W. W., & Schware, R. (2019). Climate change and society: consequences of increasing

atmospheric carbon dioxide. Routledge.

Lam, V. W., Allison, E. H., Bell, J. D., Blythe, J., Cheung, W. W., Frölicher, T. L., … &

Sumaila, U. R. (2020). Climate change, tropical fisheries, and prospects for sustainable development. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(9), 440-454.

Lu, S., Bai, X., Zhang, X., Li, W., & Tang, Y. (2019). The impact of climate change on the

sustainable development of the regional economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1387-1395.

Nordhaus, W. (2019). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review, 109(6), 1991-2014.

Browse more products here