Larry Maucieri Article Review Sample Essay.
Larry Maucieri presents and article with the title “ADHD and Weed: What’s the Draw” in the Psychology today website. Maucieri seeks to answer the question whether marijuana helps in alleviating symptoms in symptoms suffering from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. In this paper, the author presents a two and half pages of text to provide support of his thesis. Maucieri offers a narrative about an experience with one of his patients and also provides several research findings about the use of marijuana in ADHD patients. In his thesis, the author claims that marijuana may be both beneficial and also harmful to individuals with ADHD.
The authors article has two parts; one that give an account about his encounter with one of his ADHD patients and another part that presents the evidence in support of the claims in his thesis. In a narrative fashion, the author supports the thesis statement by explaining the mixed effects of marijuana experienced by his patient. To some extent, marijuana had helped the author’s patient cool his numbs and was able to perform certain activities that he could not without the drug. Despite having stopped smoking several years prior to this particular therapy, the client had experienced symptomatic improvement in terms of attention, decreasing uncomfortable feelings as well as reducing anxiety and stress at work (Maucieri, 2015). The author also indicates that the patient was able to sleep better after use of marijuana.
As the author reveals, the client also experienced negative effects of marijuana. Patient had less confidence in driving to work, had experienced reduced libido and was also becoming less conscious with meeting deadlines at work (Maucieri, 2015). From the synthesis of findings by different researchers, the author explains that the experiences of use of marijuana differ from person to person. While some individuals may experience a relief of the symptoms of ADHD, others may have exacerbations of the symptoms.
Some of the underlying claims that support the thesis by the author are comparisons from several researches that the author puts forward. Maucieri indicates that people with ADHD have a tendency to abuse stimulant drugs but more commonly, they use alcohol and marijuana. Maucieri explains that to some people, these drugs lead to an improvement in concentration whereas to others, these drugs cause a flare up of the symptoms (Maucieri, 2015). The author critically argues that studies that have evaluated the use of marijuana are quite varied and most of them have provided generalizations based on the population studied.
The author organizes the information in a fashion that gives a case record then subsequently supports the claims in his thesis with evidence from studies. He offers a combination of a narrative and comparisons of several research papers to drive his points. For instance, he presents a 2014 study at University of Albany that found out that use of marijuana improves the symptoms of hyperactivity and attention. To offer a contrast to these findings, the author also describes another study in same year that revealed that marijuana causes accentuates the symptoms of hyperactivity and inattentiveness.
The author uses direct quotations in his narration to display his conversation with his patient. He describes the patient’s reactions and quotes part of the exchange word for word. He also puts in text citations for the sources used in the development of the article. The strong evidence that he presents from research helps the author build up the support for his evidence in a scientific way. The methodology the author uses is that of analysis of secondary sources as well as an account of personal experience. Documentation of the sources using citations, which displays authenticity of the paper. The author indicates that the sources used in the article are research papers, and this helps to identify the expertise of the papers. However, the levels of evidence from these sources has not been revealed.
One of the indications of bias from the article is that it gives a personal account of an experience with a single patient. The author may be biased to conclude that effects of marijuana may be varied, yet he evaluated a single client. Additionally, the number of sources in this article are limited to two. Focusing on only two studies performed in the same year limits the discussion and conclusions by the author. I would ask the author the following questions. “What was the population size of the studies in 2014?” “In terms of effect on symptoms to patients with ADHD how do effects of use of marijuana in teenagers and adults compare?”
In conclusion, the author presents a paper that is scientifically well-organized and is informative to the reader. The author uses credible sources to provide support his thesis. The article addresses the effects of marijuana from two perspectives, which minimize author bias and maintain an open view to the subject. The combination of both narration and comparison maintains focus on the main topic and keeps the article interesting.
Maucieri, L. (2015) “ADHD and Weed: What’s the Draw?” Blog post. Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers. Retrieved From: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-distracted-couple/201502/adhd-and-weed-what-s-the-draw>.