Journal Question And Answers.
A journal question: It has to be a minimum of two full pages. It may be in first person. MLA format Please. (Detailed requirement are described below. Please quote from the attached file.)
Pages: 2 (600 words)
Deadline: 3hrs 30 minutes
Please explore your reasons for your decision to stay on the track, or swerve, in the train conductor scenario. In the Utilitarian view ( greatest good for the greatest number of lives is there ever a tipping point- ie kill four to save ten lives and so on)? Does the identity of the people (or person) ever matter more than the number of the people ( when and why)? What role does the concept of fate and responsibility play in your decision making? Is doing nothing a action (ie. if I do nothing can I abdicate moral responsibility)? How much does values and assumptions play into your decision? Can you see times when this type of decision making actually happens in society when laws, policies or even social norms are created?
there’s an attached file, please look through it. Other than that just read through my instructions for the journal
If I were the train conductor, I would have swerved on the alternatives track, which will contribute to killing on a drunk person and saving the lives of the school children. The pragmatic approach argues that it is morally right to execute an action to suffice the needs of the greater good. In particular, saving children’s lives is essential as compared to sacrificing one drunk person. The author in the article argues that “under a simpleminded quantitative case utilitarianism, anything goes as long as the number of people tortured or killed does not exceed the number of those saved (Dershowitz, 2020).” Generally, I would have maximized the welfare of the society, and an increased number of lives saved will have served me well. However, I am aware that, for me to attain the required level of welfare, instrumental harm was the price to be paid.
The identity of a person does not matter inn application of the utilitarian school of thought. Arguably main focus is directed on the society eliminating the importance of identity as per the standards occupied in the community. In society, there are individuals in different economic, social positions that are not put forth when making moral choices. Individual considerations are not cashed into the equation, thus eliminating any chance of recognizing identity as compared to the number of souls to be saved or offered greater good.
Fate is cited as a causative agent of many situations around the globe. However, individuals ought to understand life decisions is a result of choices, and one must be responsible for anything they happen to go through. Moral judgments are not an exception either, and fate serves zero impact on the outcomes realized from the dilemmas. Ultimately, fate may be blamed for any psychological decision, but responsibility must be accorded in all instances.
Psychological avoidance of making any decision contributes to the capitalization of form reason and emotion. Choice deferral is not an approach of making any decisions, and thus to suffice the moral requirements, one must make a nay choice irrespective of whether it is wrong or right. For instance, if someone was to be tortured as an approach to limit the chances of ticking bomb for the greater good. The victim will have to be abused, or the society will surfer either a decision must be settled for. It is essential to understand that making no decision cancels out the chances of receiving any viable outcomes.
In making decisions, we rely on individual senses and thus assuming that whatever our consciousness conceives, then it is true. However, hitches may arise in the process, posing some negative impact on decision making. For instance, if an individual is religious and shaped in a society where killing is an equal curse, then the probability of causing harm to passengers on board will be high. In such cases, decisions will have gone against the moral requirements of the greater good. Additionally, the sensory assumption may be aligned parallel to the conditions in the society, posing some mountable effects to the affected parties.
In the future, there are high chances of policies, laws, and social norms having decision making through assumptions and values influence. As of now, the scholarly assertion is limiting the implications of the same in decision making. Nevertheless, in the future, society might conform to modernity techniques that will accommodate assumptions and values. I am optimistic about the procedure since it will serve the conservatism in a significant way. Anticipated difficult and selection hurdles are Does the identity of the people (or person)ever matter more than the number of the people cited to be encountered in the future once the process of such decision making is implied.
Dershowitz, A. (2020). Should the Ticking Bomb Terrorist be tortured? Retrieved from https://global.oup.com/us/companion.websites/9780199997275/stud/Part4/self/Alan/