Analysis on an Editorial Sample Essay.
Use the editorial by Camille Paglia entitled “On Date Rape” (find it on page 144 of the Ch. 6 reading) or choose an editorial (Links to an external site.) or op-ed (Links to an external site.) from your own reading (including any of the texts you have read this week), and write a 2 – 4 paragraph informal essay evaluating the argument.
 Analyze each paragraph of your chosen editorial in order. Compose a list of the fallacies you find in each paragraph – give names of fallacies or identify weaknesses in reasoning (not all weaknesses can be precisely named) and illustrate with specific examples from the editorial. Avoid the trap of being too picky; you won’t necessarily find significant fallacies in every paragraph.
 During this paragraph-by-paragraph analysis, keep the argument’s conclusion in mind and ask yourself if the author provides adequate support for it.
 Next, review your paragraph-by-paragraph analysis to determine the two or three major problems in the argument. Then group and condense your list of faults or fallacies and, in a coherently written 2-4 paragraph informal essay organized around these two or three principle categories, present your evaluation of the argument. For example, if you find more than one instance of personal attack, devote one of your paragraphs to this fallacy and cite all the examples you find to support your claim. Follow the same procedures for other weaknesses.
Identify each specific example you cite either by paraphrase or direct quotation, imagining as you write that the reader is not familiar with the editorial you are critiquing. In your introduction, briefly discuss the issue of the editorial you’ve chosen, possibly supplying background information not covered in the editorial itself.
College readers who have not read the editorial and who are not familiar with all of the fallacies listed in the text.
To illustrate to a less critical reader that published arguments written by established professionals are not necessarily free of fallacious reasoning.
Requirements: 2-4 paragraphs
Analysis on an Editorial – Charter Schools
Course Full Title
I chose an editorial from the website, Love to Know, which discusses the choices of Charter Schools. This editorial is divided into seven paragraphs that discuss the differences between public schools and charter schools and whether or not public schools are better than charter schools. The following essay will analyze this editorial, https://cf.ltkcdn.net/freelance-writing/files/3357-Charter-Schools-=-Choices.pdf , taking into account its main fallacies in the paragraphs.
The main fallacies I noted throughout the essay include emotive language and hasty generalization fallacies. Although the editorial is about the free choice between charter schools and public schools, the editorial seems to support the public charter schools by generalizing the achievements of most charter schools. In contrast, it highlights more negative points about public schools by generalizing their negative points. For example, the author highlights people’s opinions when he writes that students moving to charter schools are taking money away from traditional schools (LoveToKnow, n.d.). Although this is not wrong, the fallacy of emotive language fallacy is seen when he agrees with the statement by posing the question, ‘why is this wrong?’ This question reveals the author’s personal feelings about the student’s transfer from charter schools to traditional schools.
The hasty generalization fallacy is where the editor generalizes the performance of all public schools as poor and that of all charter schools as successful. In the fourth paragraph, the author says that typical public school constraints make it impossible to individualize education (LoveToKnow, n.d.). This is a fallacy because there is not enough evidence to support this claim. Consequently, it is not known if all students who pass through public school fail to realize their individuality. It is almost impossible to take note of these fallacies in the editorial because the author uses very convincing language that a reader may fail to notice. Therefore, the article may easily misinform readers because the editorial is from a trusted source.
LoveToKnow. (n.d.). Charter Schools =Choices. https://cf.ltkcdn.net/freelance-writing/files/3357-Charter-Schools-=-Choices.pdf